Mark Drew (Redux)- cf_etc...

a compendium of railo, cfml, cfeclipse and technology topics

Mark Drew (Redux)- cf_etc...

Complete List of Web2.0 Products

February 12, 2006 ·

I am not sure if I like the terminology of "Web 2.0". I thought most of the things were pointles AJAX implementations (dont even get me started on the X in AJAX, its bloated! I prefer JSON but I am sure that AJAJ just sounds like you clearing your throat) but here is a great list of all the AJAX (grrr) and Web 2.0 applications: Complete List of Web 2.0 Products and Services
del.icio.us Digg Facebook reddit Google Bookmarks

Tags: ajax · webdev

9 responses

  • 1 Al Davidson // Sep 22, 2008 at 4:12 PM

    AJAJ? Nah, it's called AHAH now, apparently - http://microformats.org/wiki/rest/ahah - AJAX is, <valleygirl>like, SOOOO last week</valleygirl>... ;)

  • 2 Mark Drew // Sep 22, 2008 at 4:12 PM

    God, I am so behind the times on this. I think I am going to go back to writing the spec for Web 4.0 and stuff the silly lot of you :D

    I prefer AJAJ- Asynchronous Javascript and JSON. or maybe Asynchronous Javascript and Html (AJAH) or you could do it in Flash with AAAH! (Asych. Actionscript and HTML!)?

    So you telling me the resurfacing of A-HA! (Asynchronous Html Actions) is not a band but a methodology?!

  • 3 Al Davidson // Sep 22, 2008 at 4:12 PM

    Indeed! The big project I'm currently working will be full of distributed knowlege sharing using
    Asynchronous Http For Enhancing Community Knowledge In Tools, or AHFECKIT, for short.

  • 4 Mark Drew // Sep 22, 2008 at 4:12 PM

    I must say that in your meetings it must sound like everyone is clearning their throat!

  • 5 Al Davidson // Sep 22, 2008 at 4:12 PM

    not quite, but it does sometimes sound like the South Park "Chinpokomon" episode ( http://www.planearium2.de/scripts-310.htm )

  • 6 Mark Drew // Sep 22, 2008 at 4:12 PM

    I still gotta say that JSON rules. Its is awesome, no more silly XML parsing in Javascript... of course, you could go with the XSLT parser in JavaScript if you are feeling particulary masochistic.

  • 7 Al Davidson // Sep 22, 2008 at 4:12 PM

    Ick.... I always thought XML parsing in Javascript was just needlessly over-complicated, and I just had the server return Javascript or HTML anyway. Now that someone's given it a buzzword, of course, it's the talk of "teh intarweb" and a technique in it's own right. Guess that's why I'm not a dotcom millionaire - no head for branding. Ah well.

    Looking forward to your talk at the CFUG, by the way. See you there.

  • 8 Mark Drew // Sep 22, 2008 at 4:12 PM

    Should be a good presentation if I manage to get all the features implemented by then! *grumble* *moan* *code*

  • 9 Web 2.0 // Jan 22, 2010 at 12:31 PM

    hey. . it is must to make your web applications through AJAX, for better usability to the users. Web 2.0 has many features including AJAX, blog, forum, many that implement to develop your web page more attractive . .